Talk:Blur Layer - Revision history

Genete at 22:39, 4 October 2007

2007-10-04T22:39:14Z

Dooglus at 20:41, 4 October 2007

2007-10-04T20:41:19Z

Genete at 10:55, 3 October 2007

2007-10-03T10:55:40Z

Genete: Effect size parameter to be independent of render size?

2007-10-03T10:55:13Z

Effect size parameter to be independent of render size?

New page

When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one

It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 4 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: I've tried rendering blurred .sifz files to various sizes and then resizing them down after using a staightforward image resize tool, and they come out looking much the same. Synfig is intended to be resolution independant, so that's what you would expect. Can you upload .sifz files which demonstrate the problem? -- [[User:Dooglus\|dooglus]] 16:41, 4 October 2007 (EDT)		: I've tried rendering blurred .sifz files to various sizes and then resizing them down after using a staightforward image resize tool, and they come out looking much the same. Synfig is intended to be resolution independant, so that's what you would expect. Can you upload .sifz files which demonstrate the problem? -- [[User:Dooglus\|dooglus]] 16:41, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:: Sorry, I found this bug rendering a sample. Regarding to the other stuff it seems that you're right. --[[User:Genete\|Genete]] 18:39, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	:: 4800x2700 [http://www.darthfurby.com/genete/synfig/sample2.png]
		+
		+	:: 480x270 [http://www.darthfurby.com/genete/synfig/sample.png]
		+
		+	:: That's the [http://www.darthfurby.com/genete/synfig/sample.sifz sample] file

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 4 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete\|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)		It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete\|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	: I've tried rendering blurred .sifz files to various sizes and then resizing them down after using a staightforward image resize tool, and they come out looking much the same. Synfig is intended to be resolution independant, so that's what you would expect. Can you upload .sifz files which demonstrate the problem? -- [[User:Dooglus\|dooglus]] 16:41, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:55, 3 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one	+	When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one.

	It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete\|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)		It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete\|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)