Difference between revisions of "Talk:About"
From Synfig Studio :: Documentation
m (Talk:About moved to Talk:Piazzarola) |
Ohoservices (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == new doc == | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | this is ok, but we should be careful about saying that Synfig is the best tool around, | ||
| + | I think, when we look at the commercial tools at least now in 2010 there are products that do a lot more. | ||
| + | We might be technically better in some respect, but still, others are not bad. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We should really stress our unique position as a very good tool that is free and open source, | ||
| + | as well as easy to use and learn and containing all the needed features for a good animation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | No restrictions whatsoever for the upcoming animation master of the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Ohoservices|Ohoservices]] 23:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:08, 14 April 2010
new doc
this is ok, but we should be careful about saying that Synfig is the best tool around, I think, when we look at the commercial tools at least now in 2010 there are products that do a lot more. We might be technically better in some respect, but still, others are not bad.
We should really stress our unique position as a very good tool that is free and open source, as well as easy to use and learn and containing all the needed features for a good animation.
No restrictions whatsoever for the upcoming animation master of the future.
--Ohoservices 23:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
