|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | == Thoughts == | | == Thoughts == |
| − | * <strike>need to link the tutorials to the "5 samples"</strike> --[[User:Ohoservices|Ohoservices]] 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | * maybe a few screenshots or so (just some pictures to make it more colorful ;-) --[[User:Ohoservices|Ohoservices]] 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | * get help with what is Synfig good for (in the animation creation process... Genete?) --[[User:Ohoservices|Ohoservices]] 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − | * wikipedia cite (do with footnote) --[[User:Ohoservices|Ohoservices]] 22:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Content Discussion ==
| |
| − | this is an excerpt from an email discussion between zelgadis (>>> and >) and oho (>> and last answer):
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * >>> Some content of the page is disputable. I.e.:
| |
| − | * >> sure ;-)
| |
| − | * >>> "Chances are that for several reasons a 3D animations is much more time-consuming than a comparable 2D animation. "
| |
| − | * >> chances are...
| |
| − | * > Still, very disputable. ^___^
| |
| − | * I love disputes ;-) Seriously: it is just what came into my mind in one day, I am open to changes! I think being a bit inconvenient and insubordinate is a good thing. Please tell me when I'm getting to exaggerated, ok?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * >>> The classification of "Types Of Animation" is weird. I figured out that it come from Wikipedia article, but they talk about "animation techniques" - probably there's a little difference.
| |
| − | * >> I looked in several places. I found this to be weird on one hand but the most comprehensive on the other hand. I will rename that to technologies, good point!
| |
| − | * >ok.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * >>> ** "Why Do 2D Animation?" Do we really need to motivate choice of 2D animation over 3D?
| |
| − | * >> yes. newbies to animation need some help on where to start. Otherwise they would tend to 3D ("3 is more than 2" kind of reasons). I would have found it very helpful a few years ago to get this kind of short hints on where the differences are.
| |
| − | * > They are just different. Choice of technology
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * >>> depend on expected result. Maybe just point to the differences?
| |
| − | * >> tried to do that... what did I miss? Any help appreciated.
| |
| − | * > Maybe just rename "Why Do 2D Animation?" to something else?
| |
| − | * I like it... it doesn't say 3D is bad, it just answers the question "why should I do 2D when I can do 3D?". Other ideas?
| |
