Difference between revisions of "Doc talk:Overview"
From Synfig Studio :: Documentation
m (→Thoughts: syntax error) |
m (→Thoughts) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: The first paragraph "As you probably now...." is already a kind of this explanations... and this could be rewrited. Maybie adding not too much details but adding somes adhoc links (for example, wikipedia ; Motion_graphics , Computer_animation, Cutout_animation) to present quickly in what Synfig is so powerfull : Morphing/CutOut/Links . And so, why not add also a "Data Linking and automatic animation" level 1 paragraph starting at "Synfig Studio gives you flexible...." . I see two reasons, first one, to add space in this block of text, and to highlight the links capability ... or not ... ;-) --[[User:D.j.a.y|D.j.a.y]] ([[User talk:D.j.a.y|talk]]) 13:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | : The first paragraph "As you probably now...." is already a kind of this explanations... and this could be rewrited. Maybie adding not too much details but adding somes adhoc links (for example, wikipedia ; Motion_graphics , Computer_animation, Cutout_animation) to present quickly in what Synfig is so powerfull : Morphing/CutOut/Links . And so, why not add also a "Data Linking and automatic animation" level 1 paragraph starting at "Synfig Studio gives you flexible...." . I see two reasons, first one, to add space in this block of text, and to highlight the links capability ... or not ... ;-) --[[User:D.j.a.y|D.j.a.y]] ([[User talk:D.j.a.y|talk]]) 13:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | My screenshot in the layer section is from an ugly Windows desktop. Feel free to change it. --[[User:Recycler|Recycler]] ([[User talk:Recycler|talk]]) 03:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 05:37, 29 November 2012
Thoughts
The switch of topic from Synfig Studio to animation in general seems jarring to me. Could we change "As you probably know, animation is the rapid display of ..." to something related to Synfig Studio or digital animation? Recycler (talk) 07:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe we should put explanations about animation in general right into beginning? And then it will get focused on Synfigs Studio as specific tool for animation. --Zelgadis (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- The first paragraph "As you probably now...." is already a kind of this explanations... and this could be rewrited. Maybie adding not too much details but adding somes adhoc links (for example, wikipedia ; Motion_graphics , Computer_animation, Cutout_animation) to present quickly in what Synfig is so powerfull : Morphing/CutOut/Links . And so, why not add also a "Data Linking and automatic animation" level 1 paragraph starting at "Synfig Studio gives you flexible...." . I see two reasons, first one, to add space in this block of text, and to highlight the links capability ... or not ... ;-) --D.j.a.y (talk) 13:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
My screenshot in the layer section is from an ugly Windows desktop. Feel free to change it. --Recycler (talk) 03:37, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
