Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blur Layer"
From Synfig Studio :: Documentation
(Effect size parameter to be independent of render size?) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one | + | When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one. |
It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT) | It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --[[User:Genete|Genete]] 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:55, 3 October 2007
When I was preparing this page I realized that the big shape on the right doesn't look the same than the same image on the left with same Blur parameters. I wanted to achieve the same figure than the size (12,12) one.
It is something I wonder how would it work. If you have the effects parameters defined by pixels, then if you redefine the output rendered size (to be bigger) then the effects becomes different (smaller in this case). Would it be possible to define the effect parameter in other units that are independent of the output size? --Genete 06:55, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
